@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation
VS

Ford Puma vs MG MG3 – Forskelle og priser sammenlignet

Sammenlign ydeevne, bagagerum, forbrug og pris på ét sted.
Find ud af, hvilken bil der er det bedste valg for dig – Ford Puma eller MG MG3?

Ford Puma

1.7 (6 Anmeldelser)
bedøm

MG MG3

5 (1 Anmeldelser)
bedøm
Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Ford Puma vs MG MG3: A Clash of Titans

The automotive market continues to evolve, offering consumers a plethora of choices in their quest for the perfect vehicle. In this comparison, we delve into two intriguing contenders: the Ford Puma, an energetic SUV, and the MG MG3, a practical hatchback. While they serve different purposes, both vehicles present appealing features that cater to both performance and efficiency. Let’s explore the technical aspects and innovations that set these two models apart.

MG3 @ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation

Engine Performance and Efficiency

Starting with the Ford Puma, it delivers a range of power options, featuring petrol engines with mild hybrid technology and even full electric variants. The Puma’s engines produce between 125 to 168 horsepower, with 0-100 km/h acceleration times ranging from a commendable 7.4 seconds to 9.8 seconds. The fuel consumption varies between 5.4 to 6 L/100km, while the electric variant operates at a consumption rate of 13.1-13.7 kWh/100km. This impressive efficiency is complemented by an electric range of up to 376 km.

On the other hand, the MG MG3 boasts a relatively straightforward engine offering a petrol unit producing 116 horsepower with a 0-100 km/h acceleration time of 8 seconds. While it may not match the Puma in raw performance, the MG3 excels in fuel economy, consuming just 4.4 L/100km. For those seeking a balance between efficiency and power, the MG3 presents a compelling argument.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Transmissions and Drivability

The transmissions available in both vehicles also reflect their design ethos. The Ford Puma can be equipped with either a manual gearbox or a dual-clutch automatic transmission, providing drivers with a choice based on their preferences for control or convenience. Front-wheel drive is standard, ensuring a sporty feel on the road, accompanied by a range of torque outputs from 170 to 290 Nm.

The MG MG3 comes with an automatic transmission option alongside the manual gearbox, offering simplicity and ease of use. With a curb weight of 1285kg, it is lightweight compared to the Puma, which ranges from 1316 to 1563kg depending on the variant. This weight difference contributes to the MG3’s nimble handling and enhanced efficiency.

MG3 @ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation

Size, Comfort, and Practicality

When it comes to dimensions, the Ford Puma stands out with a length of 4186 mm to 4226 mm and a trunk capacity between 456 and 523 liters, offering ample space for passengers and cargo alike. Its SUV body style and higher ride height provide an elevated driving position, appealing to those who crave a more commanding presence on the road.

In contrast, the MG MG3, while shorter at 4113 mm, still manages to provide comfortable seating for five passengers but falls short in trunk space with only 293 liters. However, its compact hatchback design makes it an excellent option for city driving and parking in tight spaces.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Innovations and Technology

Both models are equipped with modern technology, focusing on driver comfort and connectivity. The Ford Puma is packed with Ford's latest infotainment systems, including smartphone integration and advanced safety features such as automatic emergency braking. Moreover, its MHEV technology ensures that drivers can enjoy improved efficiency without sacrificing performance.

The MG MG3 also offers a generous suite of tech features, such as a user-friendly infotainment system, Bluetooth connectivity, and decent safety ratings. Its design ethos focuses more on delivering value-for-money features rather than cutting-edge technology. This positioning makes the MG3 a significant player in the entry-level hatchback market.

MG3 @ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation

Final Thoughts: Which One Should You Choose?

In the battle of the Ford Puma vs. the MG MG3, the choice ultimately comes down to personal preference and needs. The Ford Puma is ideal for those seeking an efficient and energetic SUV with advanced technology and ample space. Meanwhile, the MG MG3 appeals strongly to urban drivers in need of a practical and budget-friendly hatchback.

Both vehicles have distinct advantages, and whether you align more with Ford’s innovative approach or MG’s value-driven design, you can’t go wrong with either choice in your journey toward finding the perfect car.

Her bliver det konkret: De tekniske forskelle i detaljer

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Omkostninger og forbrug:

Pris og effektivitet hører til de vigtigste faktorer – og her viser forskellene sig ofte tydeligt.

MG MG3 har en betydelig prisfordel – den starter allerede ved 141000 dkr, mens Ford Puma koster 226500 dkr. Forskellen er omkring 85492 dkr.

Der ses også en forskel i brændstofforbrug: MG MG3 nøjes med 4.40 L og er dermed mærkbar mere økonomisk end Ford Puma, der bruger 5.40 L. Forskellen er omkring 1 L pr. 100 km.

MG3 @ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation
Motor og ydeevne:

Effekt, drejningsmoment og acceleration er de klassiske mål for bilentusiaster – og her træder forskellene tydeligt frem.

Når det gælder motorkraft, har MG MG3 en let fordel – 194 HK mod 168 HK. Det svarer til en forskel på cirka 26 HK hk.

I acceleration fra 0 til 100 km/t er Ford Puma minimal hurtigere – den klarer sprinten på 7.40 s, mens MG MG3 bruger 8 s. Det er cirka 0.60 s hurtigere.

I tophastighed ligger Ford Puma i mindre grad foran – den når 210 km/h, mens MG MG3 topper ved 185 km/h. Forskellen er cirka 25 km/h.

Der er også forskel på drejningsmomentet: Ford Puma trækker tydelig kraftigere med 290 Nm mod 148 Nm. Forskellen er omkring 142 Nm.

Plads og praktiske egenskaber:

Familievenlig eller hverdagens følgesvend – hvem tilbyder mest plads, fleksibilitet og komfort?

Begge biler har plads til 5 personer.

Hvad angår egenvægt, er MG MG3 næsten umærkelig lettere – 1237 kg mod 1316 kg. Forskellen er cirka 79 kg.

Når det kommer til bagagerumsplads, tilbyder Ford Puma markant mere – 523 L mod 293 L. Forskellen er omkring 230 L.

I maksimal lastekapacitet klarer Ford Puma sig tydelig bedre – op til 1283 L, cirka 300 L mere end MG MG3.

I lasteevne vinder Ford Puma let – 469 kg mod 448 kg. Forskellen er omkring 21 kg.

Hvem vinder duellen?

Ford Puma viser sig at være sikrer sejren med klar margin og bliver dermed vores DriveDuel Champion!
I denne sammenligning er Ford Puma den mere komplette allrounder.

Ford Puma
MG MG3

Omkostninger og forbrug
Se detaljeret analyse

Motor og ydeevne
Se detaljeret analyse

Dimensioner og karrosseri
Se detaljeret analyse
fra ca. 226.500 €
Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Ford Puma

  • Motortype : Elektrisk, Benzin mild-hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatisk, Manuel
  • Drivtype : Forhjulstræk
  • Effekt HK : 125 - 168 HK
  • Forbrug L/100km : 5.4 - 5.9 L
  • Forbrug kWh/100km : 13.1 - 13.9 kWh
  • Elektrisk rækkevidde : 361 - 376 km
Detaljer

Ford Puma

1.7 (6 Anmeldelser)
bedøm

Ford Puma er en kvik og charmerende crossover, der serverer køreglæde og hverdagspraktiskhed på en gang. Med sit friske look, smarte opbevaringsidéer og livlige temperament er den perfekt til dem, der vil have sjov bag rattet uden at ofre fornuft — en lille fest i hverdagen.

Detaljer
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

MG MG3

5 (1 Anmeldelser)
bedøm

MG3 er en charmerende lille hatchback, der byder på mere udstyr end man forventer og et sprudlende design, som får den til at skille sig ud på parkeringspladsen. Den er livlig og praktisk i hverdagen og et oplagt valg for budgetbevidste bilkøbere, men søger du luksus eller helt støjsvag raffinement, skal du kigge videre.

Detaljer
KV-1-1 @ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation
Left-Back-30°-1 @ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation
Front-Row-Space-1 @ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation
Trunk-3 @ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation

Anmeldelser Ford Puma

1.7 (6 Anmeldelser)
bedøm

Anmeldelser MG MG3

5 (1 Anmeldelser)
bedøm

Top-bilsammenligninger

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Kuga
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
VS
In the competitive SUV segment, the Ford Kuga and Ford Puma cater to distinct needs with remarkable flair. The Ford Kuga offers a spacious interior and advanced tech features, making it ideal for families seeking comfort and practicality. Meanwhile, the Ford Puma stands out with its sporty design …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation
MG ZS
VS
When comparing the Ford Puma and the MG ZS, it’s clear that both models appeal to different segments of the compact SUV market. The Ford Puma impresses with its sporty handling and innovative interior design, making it a favorite for those seeking a dynamic driving experience. Meanwhile, the MG ZS …
Ford Puma
MG MG3
Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
MG3 @ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation

Omkostninger og forbrug
Pris
226500 - 332300 dkr
Pris
141000 - 195800 dkr
Forbrug L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
Forbrug L/100km
4.4 - 6.1 L
Forbrug kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
Forbrug kWh/100km
-
Elektrisk rækkevidde
361 - 376 km
Elektrisk rækkevidde
-
Batterikapacitet
43 kWh
Batterikapacitet
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
100 - 137 g/km
Tankkapacitet
42 L
Tankkapacitet
36 - 45 L

Dimensioner og karrosseri
Karrosseri
SUV
Karrosseri
Hatchback
Sæder
5
Sæder
5
Døre
5
Døre
5
Egenvægt
1316 - 1563 kg
Egenvægt
1237 - 1285 kg
Bagagerumskapacitet
456 - 523 L
Bagagerumskapacitet
293 L
Længde
4186 - 4226 mm
Længde
4113 mm
Bredde
1805 mm
Bredde
1797 mm
Højde
1550 - 1555 mm
Højde
1502 mm
Maksimal bagagerumskapacitet
1216 - 1283 L
Maksimal bagagerumskapacitet
983 L
Lastkapacitet
367 - 469 kg
Lastkapacitet
373 - 448 kg

Motor og ydeevne
Motortype
Elektrisk, Benzin mild-hybrid
Motortype
Fuld hybrid, Benzin
Transmission
Automatisk, Manuel
Transmission
Automatisk, Manuel
Transmissionsdetaljer
Reduktionsgear, Manuel gearkasse, Automatisk dobbeltkobling
Transmissionsdetaljer
Automatgearkasse, Manuel gearkasse
Drivtype
Forhjulstræk
Drivtype
Forhjulstræk
Effekt HK
125 - 168 HK
Effekt HK
116 - 194 HK
Acceleration 0-100 km/t
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100 km/t
8 - 10.8 s
Maks. hastighed
160 - 210 km/h
Maks. hastighed
170 - 185 km/h
Moment
170 - 290 Nm
Moment
148 Nm
Antal cylindre
3
Antal cylindre
4
Effekt kW
92 - 124 kW
Effekt kW
85 - 143 kW
Motorstørrelse
999 cm3
Motorstørrelse
1490 - 1495 cm3

Generelt
Modelår
2025
Modelår
2024 - 2025
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
A, D
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
C, E
Mærke
Ford
Mærke
MG

Lignende bilsammenligninger

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW ID.4
VS
Ford Puma møder VW ID.4: to modeller, der kæmper om en plads i din garage. Sammenlign deres styrker inden for ydeevne, forbrug, plads og udstyr. Den hurtige oversigt viser, hvilken bil der passer bedst til dine behov.
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Polestar Automotive Holding
Polestar 2
VS
Er du i tvivl, om Ford Puma eller Polestar 2 er det rette valg? I vores sammenligning ser du de vigtigste forskelle i motor, effektivitet, komfort og omkostninger – klart opsummeret, så du nemmere kan beslutte dig.
@ Citroën / Stellantis Media
Citroen C4
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
VS
Citroen C4 møder Ford Puma: to modeller, der kæmper om en plads i din garage. Sammenlign deres styrker inden for ydeevne, forbrug, plads og udstyr. Den hurtige oversigt viser, hvilken bil der passer bedst til dine behov.
Er Ford Puma tilgængelig med forskellige drivtyper?

Modellen tilbydes med Forhjulstræk.

De viste priser og data er estimater baseret på tyske listepriser og kan variere fra land til land. Disse oplysninger er ikke juridisk bindende.

do not click