Begge modeller har deres styrker – men hvilken passer bedst til dig?
Sammenlign ydeevne, forbrug, pris og plads direkte: Renault Clio eller Skoda Kamiq?
In the competitive automotive landscape, the Renault Clio and Skoda Kamiq stand out as appealing options for buyers seeking a blend of style, performance, and practicality. This article aims to dissect the strengths and weaknesses of both vehicles, focusing on technical specifications, innovations, and their overall market positioning.
The Renault Clio is a sleek hatchback measuring 4053mm in length, 1798mm in width, and 1440mm in height. Its compact dimensions make it an excellent choice for urban driving, providing agility and ease of parking.
In contrast, the Skoda Kamiq is classified as an SUV, offering a more robust and elevated driving position. With a length of 4241mm, width of 1793mm, and height of 1562mm, the Kamiq's dimensions contribute to its spacious interior and superior load-carrying capability.
When it comes to engine types, the Renault Clio offers multiple options, including a Full Hybrid, Petrol, and LPG variants. It delivers power outputs ranging from 67 HP in its entry-level variant to a robust 143 HP for those seeking performance. This model is highly efficient, with fuel consumption as low as 4.3 L/100km and CO2 emissions starting at 97 g/km.
On the other hand, the Skoda Kamiq exclusively features petrol engines, with power output options between 95 HP to a powerful 150 HP. While it falls slightly behind in fuel efficiency with a consumption ranging from 5.4 to 5.7 L/100km, it still offers a respectable performance and CO2 emissions of 121 to 130 g/km, depending on the variant chosen.
The Renault Clio provides a versatile transmission lineup, including an automatic gearbox, manual gearbox, and CVT options. Its driving dynamics are enhanced by front-wheel drive, offering a spirited driving experience, especially for urban maneuverability.
Conversely, the Skoda Kamiq uses a dual-clutch automatic transmission alongside manual options, enhancing its performance and giving a sportier feel during drive. Both models offer a front-wheel-drive configuration, which contributes to their agility on the road.
Acceleration from 0-100 km/h reveals the performance strengths of both vehicles. The Clio boasts an impressive range, with some variants hitting 100 km/h in as quick as 9.3 seconds, making it a fun choice for those who appreciate spirited driving.
The Skoda Kamiq doesn’t lag far behind, with its swiftest variant achieving the same speed in just 8.3 seconds. Furthermore, the Kamiq can reach a top speed of up to 214 km/h, compared to Clio's maximum of 174 km/h in the fastest version.
While being a hatchback, the Renault Clio offers adequate space for up to five passengers, with a trunk capacity of 301 L. The cabin is designed with comfort in mind, making it a practical choice for everyday use.
In contrast, the Skoda Kamiq excels in interior space and practicality, with a trunk capacity of 400 L, further emphasizing its SUV credentials. Both vehicles have room for five passengers, but the Kamiq’s generous dimensions provide an airy and spacious cabin for all occupants.
Modern technology is essential in today’s vehicles, and both models deliver in this aspect. The Renault Clio is equipped with an advanced infotainment system offering smartphone connectivity, navigation, and a host of driver assistance features designed to enhance safety and convenience.
Meanwhile, the Skoda Kamiq does not shy away from technology either, offering its own space-efficient infotainment system featuring similar driver aids alongside a digital cockpit that heightens the driving experience. The Kamiq also boasts several innovative storage solutions, a hallmark feature of the Skoda brand.
In summary, the Renault Clio and Skoda Kamiq both offer compelling packages in their respective segments. The Clio shines in its performance and urban agility, making it a favorite amongst city drivers. Conversely, the Kamiq stands out with its SUV stature, offering increased space and practicality for families or longer journeys.
Your choice ultimately depends on your personal requirements and lifestyle. If you are drawn to sporty dynamics and a compact design, the Clio is a solid contender. However, if you require more space and versatile features in an SUV format, the Kamiq may be the better fit. Whichever you choose, both vehicles emerge as fantastic options on the modern automotive market, catering to a wide array of customers.
Pris og effektivitet hører til de vigtigste faktorer – og her viser forskellene sig ofte tydeligt.
Renault Clio har en mærkbar prisfordel – den starter allerede ved 151600 dkr, mens Skoda Kamiq koster 198500 dkr. Forskellen er omkring 46860 dkr.
Der ses også en forskel i brændstofforbrug: Renault Clio nøjes med 4.30 L og er dermed tydelig mere økonomisk end Skoda Kamiq, der bruger 5.30 L. Forskellen er omkring 1 L pr. 100 km.
Effekt, drejningsmoment og acceleration siger meget om, hvordan en bil føles i hverdagen. Her ser man, hvem der leverer mest køreglæde.
Når det gælder motorkraft, har Skoda Kamiq en næsten umærkelig fordel – 150 HK mod 143 HK. Det svarer til en forskel på cirka 7 HK hk.
I acceleration fra 0 til 100 km/t er Skoda Kamiq en smule hurtigere – den klarer sprinten på 8.10 s, mens Renault Clio bruger 9.30 s. Det er cirka 1.20 s hurtigere.
I tophastighed ligger Skoda Kamiq en smule foran – den når 216 km/h, mens Renault Clio topper ved 174 km/h. Forskellen er cirka 42 km/h.
Der er også forskel på drejningsmomentet: Skoda Kamiq trækker noget kraftigere med 250 Nm mod 205 Nm. Forskellen er omkring 45 Nm.
Familievenlig eller hverdagens følgesvend – hvem tilbyder mest plads, fleksibilitet og komfort?
Begge biler har plads til 5 personer.
Hvad angår egenvægt, er Renault Clio let lettere – 1124 kg mod 1231 kg. Forskellen er cirka 107 kg.
Når det kommer til bagagerumsplads, tilbyder Skoda Kamiq næsten umærkelig mere – 400 L mod 391 L. Forskellen er omkring 9 L.
I maksimal lastekapacitet klarer Skoda Kamiq sig bemærkelsesværdig bedre – op til 1395 L, cirka 326 L mere end Renault Clio.
I lasteevne vinder Skoda Kamiq tydelig – 539 kg mod 406 kg. Forskellen er omkring 133 kg.
Samlet set fremstår Skoda Kamiq som ligger lidt foran og sikrer sig dermed titlen som DriveDuel Champion.
Den imponerer med et mere afbalanceret helhedsindtryk og er den mest alsidige i hverdagen.
Renault Clio er en kvik og charmerende bybil, der klæder bykørsel med stil og praktisk hverdagsfornuft. Den føles overraskende velkørende og velformet indvendigt, så du kan nyde dagligdagens ærinder uden at miste personligheden — og den gør det med et lille smil i spejlet.
Detaljer
@ renault-presse.de
@ renault-presse.de
@ renault-presse.de
Skoda Kamiq føles som en fornuftig crossover med masser af plads og smarte løsninger til hverdagen. Den kører trygt, er let at leve med og giver mere praktisk værdi end mange rivaler — perfekt til den, der vil have fornuft med et glimt i øjet.
Detaljer
@ Skoda Presse Deutschland
@ Skoda Presse Deutschland
@ Skoda Presse Deutschland
@ Skoda Presse Deutschland
@ Skoda Presse Deutschland
|
|
|
|
|
|
Omkostninger og forbrug |
|
|---|---|
|
Pris
151600 - 210000 dkr
|
Pris
198500 - 292000 dkr
|
|
Forbrug L/100km
4.3 - 5.3 L
|
Forbrug L/100km
5.3 - 5.7 L
|
|
Forbrug kWh/100km
-
|
Forbrug kWh/100km
-
|
|
Elektrisk rækkevidde
-
|
Elektrisk rækkevidde
-
|
|
Batterikapacitet
0.60 kWh
|
Batterikapacitet
-
|
|
co2
97 - 121 g/km
|
co2
121 - 128 g/km
|
|
Tankkapacitet
39 - 42 L
|
Tankkapacitet
50 L
|
Dimensioner og karrosseri |
|
|---|---|
|
Karrosseri
Hatchback
|
Karrosseri
SUV
|
|
Sæder
5
|
Sæder
5
|
|
Døre
5
|
Døre
5
|
|
Egenvægt
1124 - 1331 kg
|
Egenvægt
1231 - 1340 kg
|
|
Bagagerumskapacitet
301 - 391 L
|
Bagagerumskapacitet
400 L
|
|
Længde
4053 mm
|
Længde
4241 mm
|
|
Bredde
1798 mm
|
Bredde
1793 mm
|
|
Højde
1440 mm
|
Højde
1562 mm
|
|
Maksimal bagagerumskapacitet
979 - 1069 L
|
Maksimal bagagerumskapacitet
1395 L
|
|
Lastkapacitet
398 - 406 kg
|
Lastkapacitet
439 - 539 kg
|
Motor og ydeevne |
|
|---|---|
|
Motortype
Fuld hybrid, Benzin
|
Motortype
Benzin
|
|
Transmission
Automatisk, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatisk
|
|
Transmissionsdetaljer
Automatgearkasse, Manuel gearkasse
|
Transmissionsdetaljer
Manuel gearkasse, Automatisk dobbeltkobling
|
|
Drivtype
Forhjulstræk
|
Drivtype
Forhjulstræk
|
|
Effekt HK
67 - 143 HK
|
Effekt HK
95 - 150 HK
|
|
Acceleration 0-100 km/t
9.3 - 17.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100 km/t
8.1 - 11 s
|
|
Maks. hastighed
160 - 174 km/h
|
Maks. hastighed
183 - 216 km/h
|
|
Moment
95 - 205 Nm
|
Moment
175 - 250 Nm
|
|
Antal cylindre
3 - 4
|
Antal cylindre
3 - 4
|
|
Effekt kW
49 - 105 kW
|
Effekt kW
70 - 110 kW
|
|
Motorstørrelse
999 - 1598 cm3
|
Motorstørrelse
999 - 1498 cm3
|
Generelt |
|
|---|---|
|
Modelår
2023 - 2025
|
Modelår
2025
|
|
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
C, D
|
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
D
|
|
Mærke
Renault
|
Mærke
Skoda
|
Modellen tilbydes med Forhjulstræk.
De viste priser og data er estimater baseret på tyske listepriser og kan variere fra land til land. Disse oplysninger er ikke juridisk bindende.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España