MG ZS vs VW T-Roc – Ydeevne, rækkevidde og forbrug sammenlignet

MG ZS vs VW T-Roc: A Comprehensive Comparison of Two Compelling SUVs

In the ever-evolving automotive landscape, two models stand out in the compact SUV segment: the MG ZS and the VW T-Roc. While MG has made significant strides in establishing itself as a formidable contender with its electric and hybrid options, VW's T-Roc continues to impress with its versatile engine choices and refinement. This article delves into their specifications, performance attributes, and innovative features, allowing potential buyers to make an informed decision.

Engine Options and Performance

The MG ZS presents an attractive lineup featuring both electric and hybrid configurations. With a power output ranging from 156 HP to an impressive 197 HP, drivers can choose between a full electric variant with a range of up to 440 km and a hybrid model that focuses on fuel efficiency and low emissions. The ZS boasts a respectable acceleration of 0-100 km/h in as little as 8.6 seconds, coupled with a top speed of 175 km/h.

On the other hand, the VW T-Roc caters to a broader audience by offering petrol and diesel engines, with power outputs ranging from 115 HP to a staggering 300 HP in the high-performance R variant. Acceleration figures vary, with some versions reaching 100 km/h in just 4.9 seconds, showcasing the T-Roc's sporty potential. The T-Roc's top speed can reach up to 250 km/h, making it not just an eco-friendly SUV but also a thrilling ride.

Transmission and Fuel Efficiency

The MG ZS is equipped with an automatic transmission that includes both a reduction gearbox and an automatic gearbox, ensuring a smooth driving experience with commendable fuel consumption rates of approximately 5 L/100 km for the hybrid version. The electric variant, on the other hand, has an energy consumption of around 17.3 kWh/100 km, emphasizing its eco-friendly credentials.

The VW T-Roc, meanwhile, offers a choice between manual and automatic transmissions, with dual-clutch options available for sportier performance. Fuel consumption varies based on the engine choice, with efficient diesel engines returning as low as 4.7 L/100 km, while high-performance petrol versions consume up to 8.5 L/100 km under more demanding driving conditions.

Innovative Technologies and Features

When it comes to technology, the MG ZS keeps pace with modern expectations, featuring a user-friendly infotainment system that supports smartphone connectivity. Safety features abound in the ZS, with advanced driver-assistance systems enhancing peace of mind on the road.

The VW T-Roc, however, takes the lead in terms of tech advancements and premium features. Its cutting-edge digital cockpit provides customizable displays for a modern touch. The T-Roc is also equipped with numerous advanced safety features, such as lane assist, adaptive cruise control, and more, ensuring an all-round excellent driving experience.

Dimensions and Practicality

In terms of size, the MG ZS measures 4323 mm in length and 1809 mm in width, providing ample cabin space for five occupants and a trunk capacity of 448 liters. This makes it a practical choice for families and individuals requiring versatility.

The T-Roc, slightly longer at 4236 mm, offers a more refined and spacious cabin with options for both five- and four-seat configurations. The boot space ranges from 392 to 445 liters, providing slightly less than the ZS but still a practical solution for everyday use.

Final Verdict: Which SUV Reigns Supreme?

Ultimately, the choice between the MG ZS and the VW T-Roc will depend on individual preferences. The MG ZS excels with its electric and hybrid options, appealing to environmentally conscious drivers seeking cost-effective urban transportation. In contrast, the VW T-Roc impresses with its extensive range of engines, technological innovations, and superior driving dynamics, catering to those craving both comfort and performance.

Whichever SUV you choose, both models promise to deliver in terms of value, performance, and practicality, making them ideal contenders in the fiercely competitive SUV market.