Jeep Avenger vs Mazda CX-30 – Ydeevne, rækkevidde og forbrug sammenlignet

The Compact SUV Clash: Jeep Avenger vs. Mazda CX-30

The compact SUV market has never been more competitive, with automotive enthusiasts constantly on the lookout for vehicles that offer the perfect balance of performance, innovation, and style. One of the most exciting showdowns in this segment is between the Jeep Avenger and the Mazda CX-30. Each brings a unique set of features, appealing to different kinds of drivers.

Power and Performance

When it comes to engine choices, the Jeep Avenger stands out with its versatility. It offers both electric and petrol options, including a Petrol MHEV. The electric variant boasts 156 HP, accelerating from 0-100 km/h in just 9 seconds, making it a solid performer for an eco-friendly SUV with a range of 400 km.

On the other hand, the Mazda CX-30 relies on petrol MHEV engines, hitting up to 186 HP. It can accelerate from 0-100 km/h in as little as 8.3 seconds, which showcases Mazda's commitment to delivering driving pleasure. However, it doesn't offer an electric option, which might be a deal-breaker for those seeking zero-emission rides.

Transmission and Drive Dynamics

The Avenger provides a variety of transmission choices, ranging from a reduction gearbox to manual and dual-clutch automatic options. With front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive configurations, it provides adaptable performance for different driving conditions.

Similarly, the CX-30 is available with either a manual or an automatic gearbox, along with front-wheel and all-wheel drive options. Mazda's precision tuning and engineering are evident in the drive feel, promising an engaging experience behind the wheel.

Dimensions and Practicality

In terms of size, the Jeep Avenger measures 4084 mm in length, making it slightly more compact than the CX-30, which is 4395 mm long. The compact dimension of the Avenger provides ease of maneuverability in urban settings. However, the CX-30 offers a larger trunk capacity of 430 liters, compared to the Avenger's 355 liters, making it the better choice for those who prioritize cargo space.

Efficiency and Environmental Impact

Both SUVs are known for their impressive fuel efficiency. The Avenger's petrol variant consumes between 5.4 to 5.7 L/100km, while the CX-30 ranges from 5.7 to 6.6 L/100km. As an electric model, the Avenger uses just 15.4 kWh/100km, representing a true testament to Jeep's commitment to reducing environmental impact.

When considering CO2 efficiency, the Avenger offers a more environmentally friendly range with classes from A to D. Meanwhile, the CX-30's classification ranges between D and E, reflecting a higher environmental footprint due to its larger engine capacity and power output.

Final Thoughts: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between the Jeep Avenger and the Mazda CX-30 largely depends on your priorities as a driver. If you seek a groundbreaking electric option with a nimble size, the Jeep Avenger beckons. However, if performance and drivability are priorities, Mazda's heritage in creating some of the most driver-centric vehicles shines through in the CX-30.

Both SUVs demonstrate why compact SUVs are highly in demand, offering practical features, innovation, and performance that make the daily drive a pleasure in their own rights. Whichever you choose, rest assured that both the Avenger and CX-30 are bound to keep you excited on the road.