Peugeot 2008 vs VW T-Roc – Forskelle og priser sammenlignet

In the competitive compact SUV market, two models stand out: the Peugeot 2008 and the VW T-Roc. Both vehicles offer distinct advantages and innovations that cater to diverse consumer preferences. This article delves into a comprehensive comparison of these two popular models based on technical specifications, performance, and innovative features.

Design and Dimensions

The Peugeot 2008 boasts a sleek and modern design, measuring 4304 mm in length, 1770 mm in width, and 1523 mm in height. Its sporty aesthetics are complemented by a distinctive front grille and sharp LED headlights, giving it a bold road presence.

In contrast, the VW T-Roc presents a more robust appearance. Depending on the specific variant, it measures between 4236 mm and 4271 mm in length, 1811 mm in width, and a height that ranges from 1527 mm to 1584 mm. This size gives the T-Roc a slightly larger footprint, providing additional cabin space.

Engine Options and Performance

Under the hood, the Peugeot 2008 offers a range of engine types including a Petrol MHEV (Mild Hybrid), traditional Petrol options, and an electric variant. It delivers power outputs ranging from 101 HP to 156 HP, demonstrating versatility across different driver preferences. The 2008 is notable for its acceleration, achieving 0-100 km/h in as little as 8.3 seconds, with a top speed of 206 km/h.

The VW T-Roc, on the other hand, features a broader range of options, encompassing both petrol and diesel engines. Power outputs vary from 115 HP to a staggering 300 HP, especially in the performance-oriented R variant. The acceleration times vary widely as well, with the quickest model achieving 0-100 km/h in just 4.9 seconds, showcasing the T-Roc’s performance prowess. The maximum speed across its variants can reach up to 250 km/h, making it a notable option for speed enthusiasts.

Fuel Efficiency and CO2 Emissions

Fuel efficiency is a critical consideration for buyers today. The Peugeot 2008 is impressively efficient, with consumption rates as low as 5 L/100 km, depending on the engine variant. The electric version also boasts an electric range of up to 406 km, making it viable for eco-conscious drivers.

The VW T-Roc shows decent efficiency, with fuel consumption ranging from 4.7 L/100 km to 8.5 L/100 km. The diesel options are particularly economical, ideal for those who prioritize mileage. However, its CO2 emissions vary, with some variants rated as high as 166 g/km, showing that the T-Roc may not be as green as the 2008.

Interior Comfort and Technology

When it comes to interior comfort, the Peugeot 2008 offers a spacious cabin with ample room for five passengers. It features advanced technologies such as a digital cockpit and an intuitive infotainment system that integrates seamlessly with smartphones. Additionally, the trunk capacity of 434 liters provides excellent space for luggage or groceries.

The VW T-Roc, with its stylish design and ergonomic layout, can also comfortably seat five people. Its trunk capacity is slightly higher, ranging from 284 liters to 445 liters depending on the configuration. Notable technological advancements include a customizable digital cockpit and various connectivity options, enhancing driver and passenger experience alike.

Safety Features and Innovations

Both the Peugeot 2008 and VW T-Roc are equipped with cutting-edge safety features. The 2008 includes advanced systems like autonomous emergency braking and lane-keeping assist, earning high safety ratings in crash tests.

The T-Roc comes loaded with features such as adaptive cruise control, blind-spot monitoring, and park assist technologies, making it equally competitive in safety parameters. Both models offer peace of mind to drivers and passengers alike.

Conclusion

In the battle between the Peugeot 2008 and VW T-Roc, each model presents its unique strengths. The 2008 shines with its electrifying options, impressive fuel efficiency, and striking design. In contrast, the T-Roc captivates with its varied engine selections, performance capabilities, and robust safety features. Ultimately, the choice between these two SUVs will depend on individual preferences, but either way, both models exemplify the best of what the compact SUV market has to offer.