Mazda CX-30 vs Skoda Kamiq – Forskelle og priser sammenlignet

Mazda CX-30 vs Skoda Kamiq: A Comprehensive Comparison

The compact SUV segment is thriving, and two competitors that have captured the attention of consumers are the Mazda CX-30 and the Skoda Kamiq. Both vehicles offer unique features and specifications that cater to different preferences. In this comparison, we will explore various technical aspects, innovations, and overall aesthetics, helping you make an informed decision.

Dimensions and Design

Starting with their sizes, the Mazda CX-30 measures 4395 mm in length, 1795 mm in width, and stands at 1540 mm in height. This gives it a poised and athletic stance on the road. In comparison, the Skoda Kamiq is slightly smaller, with dimensions of 4241 mm in length, 1793 mm in width, and 1562 mm in height. While both vehicles offer a modern aesthetic, the CX-30 presents a more premium look with its sharp lines and sophisticated design.

Engine and Performance

When it comes to performance, the Mazda CX-30 offers a variety of engine options, with power outputs ranging from 140 to 186 HP. It provides two transmission options: a manual gearbox and an automatic gearbox, ensuring flexibility for drivers. The CX-30 also offers impressive acceleration, with a 0-100 km/h time of as low as 8.3 seconds. Skoda’s Kamiq, on the other hand, features a diverse engine range as well, producing between 95 to 150 HP. The Kamiq is equipped with either a manual gearbox or a dual-clutch automatic, making it user-friendly and responsive.

Fuel consumption is competitive in both vehicles, with the CX-30 showing figures ranging from 5.7 to 6.6 L/100km, whereas the Kamiq performs slightly better at 5.4 to 5.7 L/100km. This efficiency combined with the CX-30's maximum speeds of up to 204 km/h gives it an edge in performance dynamics.

Technology and Innovations

In terms of technology, the CX-30 is equipped with Mazda's latest infotainment system, offering seamless smartphone integration and a premium audio experience. Safety features are plentiful, including adaptive cruise control and lane-keep assist, enhancing the driving experience.

The Skoda Kamiq also features an impressive infotainment system with SmartLink technology for mobile connectivity, and its safety suite includes advanced driver-assistance systems, making it a formidable competitor in this arena. Both vehicles offer ample connectivity options, but Mazda’s focus on driver engagement slightly enhances its appeal for driving enthusiasts.

Interior Space and Comfort

Inside, the CX-30 provides a spacious cabin with a trunk capacity of up to 430 liters, making it suitable for family outings or weekend getaways. The Kamiq offers slightly less cargo space at 400 liters but has a well-thought-out layout for passenger comfort. Both vehicles accommodate five passengers comfortably, but the CX-30 tends to provide a more upscale feel with its materials and overall design.

Environmental Impact and Efficiency

From an environmental perspective, both vehicles are relatively efficient, although the CX-30 has a slightly higher CO2 emissions output, ranging from 129 to 148 g/km compared to the Kamiq’s 121 to 130 g/km. This indicates that if low emissions are a priority, the Kamiq has the advantage.

Conclusion: Which One to Choose?

Ultimately, the choice between the Mazda CX-30 and the Skoda Kamiq depends on individual preferences. If you prioritize performance, a premium feel, and cutting-edge design, the Mazda CX-30 may be the right pick. However, if budget efficiency, compact dimensions, and practicality are more important to you, the Skoda Kamiq is a worthy contender.

In the end, both SUVs offer a blend of style, performance, and comfort, making them excellent options for anyone looking to enter the compact SUV market.