Subaru Outback vs Suzuki Across – Hvilken model klarer sig bedst i hverdagen?

Subaru Outback vs Suzuki Across: A Comprehensive Comparison

When it comes to versatile family vehicles, the Subaru Outback and Suzuki Across stand out for their unique offerings. Both vehicles are designed to provide comfort, safety, and utility, yet they cater to different consumer needs. This article dives deep into the technical specifications and innovations of both models to help potential buyers make an informed decision.

Powertrain and Performance

The Subaru Outback is powered by a 2.5-liter petrol engine that generates an impressive 169 HP (124 kW) and a torque of 252 Nm. Its Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) equips it with a smooth driving experience, achieving a 0-100 km/h time of 10.2 seconds. The Outback is designed for those who enjoy reliable performance both on and off-road, boasting an all-wheel-drive (AWD) system that enhances traction in various conditions. With a maximum speed of 193 km/h, the Outback is well-suited for both daily commutes and weekend getaways.

On the other hand, the Suzuki Across incorporates a more modern powertrain—a plug-in hybrid system that combines a 2.5-liter petrol engine with an electric motor, producing a total of 306 HP (225 kW). This remarkable output allows the Across to accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in just 6 seconds, marking a significant edge over the Outback in terms of performance. With its AWD capability and a maximum speed of 180 km/h, the Across targets eco-conscious consumers who desire powerful performance without sacrificing fuel efficiency.

Fuel Efficiency and Emissions

The Subaru Outback offers decent fuel efficiency but has a higher consumption rate of 8.6 L/100 km, leading to an emissions output of 193 g/km CO2. While it may not be the most efficient option in its class, the Outback remains a reliable workhorse for a variety of driving scenarios.

In contrast, the Suzuki Across excels in fuel economy with an astonishing consumption figure of just 1 L/100 km when driven predominantly in electric mode. The vehicle boasts an electric range of up to 75 km and emits a mere 22 g/km CO2, placing it in the coveted CO2 efficiency class B. This makes it an appealing option for those looking to minimize their carbon footprint while enjoying the advantages of a robust SUV.

Interior Space and Comfort

Both vehicles seat five and feature spacious interiors, but they cater to different needs when it comes to cargo capacity. The Subaru Outback offers an impressive trunk capacity of 561 liters, accommodating bulky items with ease. Moreover, the Outback's dimensions of 4870 mm in length, 1875 mm in width, and a height ranging from 1670 to 1675 mm ensure ample headroom and legroom for all passengers.

In comparison, the Suzuki Across has a slightly smaller trunk capacity of 490 liters. Its dimensions—4635 mm length, 1855 mm width, and a height of 1690 mm—provide a comfortable cabin but may lack the expansive storage space ideal for adventurous outings.

Innovations and Technology

The Subaru Outback is well-equipped with safety features such as EyeSight Driver Assist Technology, which includes adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, and pre-collision braking. Additionally, the infotainment system offers smartphone compatibility, ensuring ease of access to navigation and entertainment options.

The Suzuki Across, however, steps it up with its modern hybrid technology, allowing drivers to switch between electric and petrol modes seamlessly. It also boasts a host of safety features, including adaptive cruise control and lane departure warning, along with advanced connectivity options that elevate the driving experience.

Final Thoughts

Choosing between the Subaru Outback and Suzuki Across ultimately depends on your priorities. The Outback excels in traditional fuel efficiency while offering ample space and proven capability, making it ideal for consumers who prioritize practicality and ruggedness. Meanwhile, the Suzuki Across brings the latest in hybrid technology and eco-friendliness, coupled with robust performance, appealing to environmentally conscious buyers seeking modernity and power.

Both vehicles have their attributes, but understanding their differences will help you choose the one that best meets your lifestyle needs.