Mazda CX-30 vs SEAT Arona – Hvilken bil er det bedste køb?

The automotive segment is constantly evolving, and in the compact SUV segment, two standout contenders are the Mazda CX-30 and the SEAT Arona. Both vehicles cater to a growing audience that values versatility, advanced technology, and dynamic driving experiences. In this article, we'll dive deep into the specifications, features, and innovations that define these two remarkable SUVs.

Design and Dimensions

The Mazda CX-30 presents a striking design that embodies Mazda's Kodo philosophy, which emphasizes elegance and a sense of motion. Measuring 4395 mm in length, 1795 mm in width, and 1540 mm in height, the CX-30 offers a robust and modern silhouette that appeals to many buyers.

On the other hand, the SEAT Arona, while smaller at 4153 mm in length, 1780 mm in width, and 1537 mm in height, still boasts an athletic stance and an eye-catching design. The Arona targets urban drivers who appreciate a compact vehicle but do not want to sacrifice style and functionality.

Performance and Powertrains

Looking under the hood, the Mazda CX-30 is equipped with a range of petrol hybrid engines, offering two power outputs: 140 HP and 186 HP. Its 1998 cm³ engine provides sufficient torque (up to 240 Nm), allowing it to accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 8.3 seconds. The CX-30 also features both a manual and automatic gearbox, catering to different driving preferences.

The SEAT Arona offers three petrol engine options, ranging from 95 HP to a potent 150 HP. The standout performance version can reach 0 to 100 km/h in a competitive 8.4 seconds. The Arona’s engine lineup is complemented by a manual gearbox and a dual-clutch automatic option for seamless gear shifts, making it a solid choice for performance-oriented drivers.

Fuel Efficiency and Environmental Impact

Fuel efficiency is a crucial aspect for many buyers. The Mazda CX-30 records a consumption figure between 5.7 and 6.6 L/100 km, which is commendable for its class, given its performance capabilities. The vehicle also emits CO2 levels ranging from 129 to 148 g/km, placing it in an efficiency class of D to E.

On the contrary, the SEAT Arona excels slightly in this category, offering a remarkable consumption between 5.4 and 5.6 L/100 km and CO2 emissions ranging from 122 to 128 g/km, solidifying its position in the D efficiency class. This makes the Arona a more environmentally friendly option for those concerned about emissions.

Interior Comfort and Technology

Inside, the Mazda CX-30 emphasizes a premium feel, incorporating high-quality materials and an ergonomic layout. The spacious cabin comfortably seats five adults, with a trunk capacity of 430 liters, making it practical for daily use. The CX-30 also integrates a suite of modern technology, including a user-friendly infotainment system with smartphone connectivity, advanced safety features, and driver-assist technologies.

The SEAT Arona, on the other hand, offers a youthful and tech-savvy interior. Its trunk capacity of 400 liters is slightly less than that of the CX-30, but it still provides ample storage for everyday needs. The Arona focuses heavily on connectivity, featuring an advanced infotainment system with accessibility to various apps, making it a favorite among younger drivers.

Conclusion: The Right Choice for You

In conclusion, both the Mazda CX-30 and the SEAT Arona bring unique strengths to the compact SUV segment. The CX-30 impresses with its performance, upscale interior, and advanced safety technologies, while the Arona stands out with its fuel efficiency, compact dimensions for urban driving, and youthful flair.

Your choice ultimately depends on your personal priorities: whether you lean towards performance and comfort or prefer efficiency and style. Test driving both vehicles will surely help in making the right decision tailored to your needs.