VS

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer vs Ford Kuga – Hvilken model klarer sig bedst i hverdagen?

Begge modeller har deres styrker – men hvilken passer bedst til dig?
Sammenlign ydeevne, forbrug, pris og plads direkte: BMW 2 Series Active Tourer eller Ford Kuga?

BMW 2er Active Tourer vs Ford Kuga: A Comprehensive Comparison

The automotive market is brimming with options for families and individuals seeking versatile vehicles that blend performance with practicality. Two notable contenders in the MPV and SUV categories are the BMW 2er Active Tourer and the Ford Kuga. While both vehicles offer spacious interiors and advanced technologies, they cater to different preferences. This article explores their technical aspects, performance, and innovative features to help you make an informed choice.

Design and Dimensions

The BMW 2er Active Tourer, designed primarily as a Multi-Purpose Vehicle (MPV), measures 4,386 mm in length, 1,824 mm in width, and 1,576 mm in height. Its compact design makes it ideal for urban navigation while still providing ample interior space for passengers and cargo. The trunk capacity ranges from 406 to 470 liters, depending on the configuration.

In contrast, the Ford Kuga stands as a more traditional SUV. Available in lengths between 4,604 mm and 4,645 mm, and a width of 1,882 mm, it provides a commanding road presence. The Kuga's trunk capacity is slightly smaller at 412 liters but benefits from flexible seating arrangements, making it versatile for various storage needs.

Engine Options and Performance

When it comes to under-the-hood options, the BMW 2er Active Tourer offers a broader range of engines. Available in petrol, diesel, and hybrid configurations, power outputs vary from 122 HP to a staggering 326 HP, accommodating a diverse audience from eco-conscious drivers to those seeking thrill and speed. The Active Tourer's power delivery is smooth, with acceleration from 0-100 km/h in as quick as 5.5 seconds for the top variant.

The Ford Kuga, on the other hand, features petrol and hybrid engines, with power outputs peaking at 243 HP. Acceleration times for the Kuga range from 7.3 to 9.5 seconds, which is respectable, but does not match the range of dynamics offered by the BMW. For drivers who prioritize efficiency, the Kuga's engines provide competitive fuel consumption, with the full hybrid variant achieving an impressive 5.3 L/100 km.

Hybrid Innovations

Both models embrace hybrid technology, catering to environmentally-conscious consumers. The 2er Active Tourer boasts plug-in hybrid options with an impressive electric range of up to 88 km and a battery capacity of 14.2 kWh. This allows for short daily commutes to be tackled solely on electric power, reducing emissions significantly.

Meanwhile, the Ford Kuga offers a traditional hybrid and plug-in hybrid variant, but with a lower electric range of 69 km and a battery pack of 14.4 kWh. This suggests that while the Kuga's hybrids can support shorter journeys electrically, the BMW has the upper hand in offering a more extensive electric-only range, emphasizing its advanced hybrid technologies.

Technology and Safety Features

Neither brand compromises on technology and safety. The 2er Active Tourer is equipped with a cutting-edge infotainment system, featuring a large display, smartphone integration via Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, and a suite of advanced driver assistance systems. Safety ratings reflect BMW's commitment to building secure vehicles, with features such as forward collision warning and adaptive cruise control.

Similarly, the Ford Kuga is loaded with technology, offering a user-friendly touchscreen interface, similar smartphone connectivity, and several driver support features. The Kuga's safety performance is also commendable, with numerous awards for its safety protocols—ensuring peace of mind for families.

Driving Experience

The driving experience in the BMW 2er Active Tourer leans towards sporty. With different driving modes and a responsive chassis, it delivers a dynamic ride that enthusiasts will appreciate. Additionally, the option for all-wheel drive enhances stability and traction, particularly in adverse weather conditions.

The Ford Kuga, while not as performance-oriented, provides a comfortable and smooth drive. Its higher seating position offers good visibility, making it a practical choice for daily driving and family excursions. Front-wheel and all-wheel drive options also give drivers the benefit of versatility, though the driving feel may not be as enthusiastic as that of the BMW.

Conclusion: Which One Wins?

Choosing between the BMW 2er Active Tourer and the Ford Kuga ultimately comes down to individual preferences and needs. If you are looking for a family-oriented vehicle that does not compromise on performance and technology, the 2er Active Tourer stands out as an excellent option with its impressive range of engines and advanced hybrid capabilities.

However, if you prefer a spacious and practical SUV with solid performance and a feature-rich cabin, the Ford Kuga is a formidable competitor, offering great flexibility. Both vehicles have their unique advantages, making them worthy considerations in today’s competitive market.

Her bliver det konkret: De tekniske forskelle i detaljer

Omkostninger og forbrug: Når det handler om økonomi i hverdagen, viser de to modeller interessante forskelle.

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer har en noget fordel i prisen – den starter allerede ved 283700 dkr, mens Ford Kuga koster 313100 dkr. Forskellen er omkring 29385 dkr.

Der ses også forskel i brændstofforbruget: BMW 2 Series Active Tourer nøjes med 0.90 L og er dermed markant mere økonomisk end Ford Kuga, der bruger 2.80 L. Forskellen er omkring 1.90 L pr. 100 km.

Hvad rækkevidde angår, klarer BMW 2 Series Active Tourer sig noget bedre: den kan køre op til 85 km, cirka 17 km mere end Ford Kuga.

Motor og ydeevne: Under motorhjelmen viser det sig, hvilken model der er mest sportslig, og hvem der klarer bedst afsættet.

Når det gælder motorkraft, har BMW 2 Series Active Tourer en bemærkelsesværdig fordel – 326 HK mod 243 HK. Det svarer til en forskel på cirka 83 HK hk.

I acceleration fra 0 til 100 km/t er BMW 2 Series Active Tourer mærkbar hurtigere – 5.50 s mod 7.30 s. Det er cirka 1.80 s hurtigere.

I tophastighed ligger BMW 2 Series Active Tourer i mindre grad foran – den når 238 km/h, mens Ford Kuga topper ved 200 km/h. Forskellen er cirka 38 km/h.

Der er også forskel på drejningsmomentet: BMW 2 Series Active Tourer trækker tydelig kraftigere med 477 Nm mod 240 Nm. Forskellen er omkring 237 Nm.

Plads og praktiske egenskaber: Familievenlig eller hverdagens følgesvend – hvem tilbyder mest plads, fleksibilitet og komfort?

Begge biler har plads til 5 personer.

Hvad egenvægt angår, er Ford Kuga minimal lettere – 1526 kg mod 1545 kg. Forskellen er cirka 19 kg.

Når det kommer til bagagerumsplads, tilbyder BMW 2 Series Active Tourer noget mere – 470 L mod 412 L. Forskellen er omkring 58 L.

I maksimal lastekapacitet klarer Ford Kuga sig knap mærkbar bedre – op til 1534 L, cirka 79 L mere end BMW 2 Series Active Tourer.

Også i lasteevne vinder Ford Kuga knap mærkbar – 550 kg mod 505 kg. Forskellen er omkring 45 kg.

Vores konklusion: BMW 2 Series Active Tourer viser sig at være dominerer sammenligningen og bliver dermed vores DriveDuel Champion!
I denne sammenligning er BMW 2 Series Active Tourer den mere komplette allrounder.

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer

BMW 2er Active Tourer kombinerer det elegante design med praktisk funktionalitet, hvilket gør den til et ideelt valg for familier og aktive livsstile. Bilens rummelige kabine og fleksible bagagerum gør det nemt at håndtere hverdagens udfordringer, samtidig med at den tilbyder en behagelig køreoplevelse. Med sine avancerede teknologier og forbindelsesmuligheder er 2er Active Tourer perfekt til både bykørsel og længere rejser.

Detaljer

Ford Kuga

3.5 (2)
bedøm

Ford Kuga imponerer med sin stilfulde design og rummelige interiør, der gør den til et ideelt valg for familier. Den leverer en fremragende køreoplevelse og gode håndteringsegenskaber, uanset om du pendler til arbejde eller tager på weekendudflugt. Med moderne teknologi og et fokus på sikkerhed er Kuga en bil, der virkelig skiller sig ud på vejen.

Detaljer
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer
Ford Kuga
2 Series Active Tourer
Kuga

Omkostninger og forbrug

Pris
283700 - 438800 dkr
Pris
313100 - 423500 dkr
Forbrug L/100km
0.9 - 6.2 L
Forbrug L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L
Forbrug kWh/100km
-
Forbrug kWh/100km
-
Elektrisk rækkevidde
85 km
Elektrisk rækkevidde
68 km
Batterikapacitet
14.20 kWh
Batterikapacitet
1.1 - 14.4 kWh
co2
20 - 140 g/km
co2
55 - 154 g/km
Tankkapacitet
45 - 54 L
Tankkapacitet
42 - 54 L

Dimensioner og karrosseri

Karrosseri
MPV
Karrosseri
SUV
Sæder
5
Sæder
5
Døre
5
Døre
5
Egenvægt
1545 - 1920 kg
Egenvægt
1526 - 1859 kg
Bagagerumskapacitet
406 - 470 L
Bagagerumskapacitet
412 L
Længde
4386 mm
Længde
4604 - 4645 mm
Bredde
1824 mm
Bredde
1882 mm
Højde
1576 mm
Højde
1673 - 1681 mm
Maksimal bagagerumskapacitet
1370 - 1455 L
Maksimal bagagerumskapacitet
1534 L
Lastkapacitet
465 - 505 kg
Lastkapacitet
541 - 550 kg

Motor og ydeevne

Motortype
Plugin-hybrid, Benzin, Benzin mild-hybrid, Diesel, Diesel mild-hybrid
Motortype
Benzin, Fuld hybrid, Plugin-hybrid
Transmission
Automatisk
Transmission
Manuel, Automatisk
Transmissionsdetaljer
Automatisk dobbeltkobling
Transmissionsdetaljer
Manuel gearkasse, CVT, Automatgearkasse
Drivtype
Firehjulstræk, Forhjulstræk
Drivtype
Forhjulstræk, Firehjulstræk
Effekt HK
122 - 326 HK
Effekt HK
150 - 243 HK
Acceleration 0-100 km/t
5.5 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100 km/t
7.3 - 9.9 s
Maks. hastighed
195 - 238 km/h
Maks. hastighed
195 - 200 km/h
Moment
230 - 477 Nm
Moment
240 Nm
Antal cylindre
3 - 4
Antal cylindre
3 - 4
Effekt kW
90 - 240 kW
Effekt kW
111 - 178 kW
Motorstørrelse
1499 - 1998 cm3
Motorstørrelse
1496 - 2488 cm3

Generelt

Modelår
2024
Modelår
2025
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
B, E, D
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
E, D, B
Mærke
BMW
Mærke
Ford
Hvilke drivlinjer findes til BMW 2 Series Active Tourer?

Tilgængelig som Firehjulstræk eller Forhjulstræk.

De viste priser og data er estimater baseret på tyske listepriser og kan variere fra land til land. Disse oplysninger er ikke juridisk bindende.