Audi A3 Sportback vs Mazda CX-30 – Forskelle og priser sammenlignet

A Battle of Compact Versatility: Audi A3 Sportback vs. Mazda CX-30

When it comes to the competitive hatchback and crossover segment, the Audi A3 Sportback and Mazda CX-30 stand out as exceptional options. Both cater to diverse needs, combining style with practicality, yet they embody distinct characteristics influenced by their manufacturer’s philosophies. This article delves into the technical specifications and innovations of each model, providing a comprehensive comparison for prospective buyers.

Design and Body Type

The Audi A3 Sportback presents itself as a sleek and sporty hatchback, designed for drivers who value agility and aesthetics. With a length of 4,353 mm and a width of 1,816 mm, it offers a compact form that is easily maneuverable in urban environments. The trunk capacity stands at a respectable 380 liters, providing adequate space for luggage or shopping.

In contrast, the Mazda CX-30 adopts the SUV body type, delivering a more pronounced road presence. Measuring 4,395 mm in length and 1,795 mm in width, this model combines higher seating without compromising driving dynamics. The CX-30 boasts a larger trunk capacity of 430 liters, making it better suited for families or those who require more cargo space.

Engine Options and Performance

The Audi A3 Sportback offers a variety of engine options, including petrol, diesel, and plug-in hybrids, with power outputs ranging from 116 to an exhilarating 400 HP. Its performance is bolstered by advanced technologies such as mild hybrid electric vehicle (MHEV) systems. The A3 Sportback can achieve impressive 0-100 km/h acceleration times as low as 3.8 seconds, depending on the variant chosen.

On the other hand, the Mazda CX-30 is powered by a petrol MHEV engine, delivering up to 186 HP. Although it doesn’t match the sheer power range of the A3, its performance is competitive within its segment. Acceleration times peak at around 8.3 seconds, making it a responsive choice for everyday driving.

Fuel Efficiency and Emissions

In the realm of fuel efficiency, the Audi A3 Sportback impresses with consumption figures as low as 4.8 L/100 km across its various engine options. It also benefits from a lower CO2 output, rated as low as 120 g/km for some versions, appealing to environmentally conscious buyers.

The Mazda CX-30, though slightly less efficient, still offers competitive performance. Its fuel consumption varies from 5.7 to 6.6 L/100 km, with CO2 emissions ranging from 129 to 148 g/km, positioning it as a respectable option in terms of running costs.

Technology and Innovations

Both the Audi A3 Sportback and Mazda CX-30 come equipped with cutting-edge technology that enhances the driving experience. Audi's MMI infotainment system stands out with its user-friendly interface and an optional Virtual Cockpit that puts critical information right in front of the driver. Advanced driver assistance systems, including adaptive cruise control and lane departure warning, further enhance safety.

The Mazda CX-30 features Mazda's latest infotainment system, which, while intuitive, relies on a dial control that some may find less accessible while driving. It also includes a suite of safety technologies, such as blind-spot monitoring and smart braking assistance, ensuring peace of mind during daily commutes.

Final Thoughts

Choosing between the Audi A3 Sportback and Mazda CX-30 ultimately depends on individual preferences and priorities. The A3 Sportback is the choice for those seeking performance-oriented driving and a premium feel wrapped in a compact package. Meanwhile, the CX-30 offers practicality, style, and a higher driving position, appealing to those who prioritize versatility and cargo space.

Both vehicles highlight the respective brands' commitment to innovation and excellence, ensuring that whichever model you choose, you’ll enjoy a remarkable driving experience.